检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙丽立 王乐乐[1] 尹胜杰[1] 季洪波[1] SUN Lili;WANG Lele;YIN Shengjie;JI Hongbo(Department of First Internal Medicine in Oncology,Chifeng Hospital,Chifeng Inner Mongolia 024000,China)
机构地区:[1]赤峰市医院肿瘤内一科,内蒙古赤峰024000
出 处:《中国卫生标准管理》2019年第2期69-71,共3页China Health Standard Management
摘 要:目的探讨同步放化疗、序贯性放化疗在晚期食管癌治疗中的临床效果。方法选取2014年2月—2017年2月收治的98例晚期食管癌患者作研究对象,按放化疗方案不同予以分组:同步组(n=49)采取同步放化疗方案,序贯组(n=49)采取序贯性放化疗方案,对比近期疗效以及副反应的差异。结果同步组的近期治疗有效率高于序贯组(P <0.05),且副反应发生率高于序贯组(P <0.05)。结论同步放化疗在晚期食管癌治疗中的近期疗效优于序贯性放化疗,虽会增加副反应,但患者可耐受。Objective To investigate the clinical effect of concurrent radiotherapy and sequential radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer.Methods Ninety-eight patients with advanced esophageal cancer admitted from February 2014 to February 2017 were selected as the study subjects.They were grouped according to different radiotherapy and chemotherapy schemes:synchronous group(n=49)adopted synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy scheme,and sequential group(n=49)adopted sequential radiotherapy and chemotherapy scheme.The short-term efficacy and side effects were compared.Results The short-term effective rate of synchronous group was higher than that of sequential group(P<0.05),and the incidence of side effects was higher than that of sequential group(P<0.05).Conclusion The short-term efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer is better than that of sequential chemoradiotherapy.Although it can increase side effects,it is tolerable for patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188