检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张礼恒[1] ZHANG Li-heng(School of History and Culture,Liaocheng University,Liaocheng 252059, China)
出 处:《烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2019年第2期94-100,共7页Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基 金:山东省社会科学规划重大项目"从闭关到开放:朝士视察团研究"(13BLBSJ02);韩国东北亚历史财团资助项目
摘 要:"结日本"是何如璋、黄遵宪在《朝鲜策略》中为朝鲜开具的救时良策,前承"亲中国",后续"联美国",达致"图自强",形成一个完整的外交构想。迄今为止,中外学术界在《朝鲜策略》的研究上成果颇丰,评价甚高,但对"结日本"问题的研究却存在着严重的不足。事实上,《朝鲜策略》所提"结日本"问题,明显是与清政府此期的对朝政策相抵触的。这与何如璋、黄遵宪对朝策略的整体构想、清政府外交官选派机制的缺陷、总理衙门的权威性不强有密切的关系。因此,对《朝鲜策略》的历史地位必须重新评判。A complete diplomatic concept came into existence when“bonding with Japan” strategy was proposed by He Ruzhang and Huang Zunxian for Korea in the 1880s,together with “propping China” before and “allying with the United States” after. Up to now,the academia at home and abroad have made a lot of achievements in the research of the Korean Strategy and highly appraised it,but there are serious deficiencies in the research of “bonding with Japan”. In fact,the issue of “bonding with Japan” mentioned in the Korean Strategy was obviously in conflict with the policy of the Qing dynasty towards Korea in this period. This is closely related to the overall conception on Korean strategy of He Ruzhang and Huang Zunxian,the defect of the Qing Governmental mechanism of appointing diplomats,and the lack of the authority of the Zongli Yamen. Therefore,the historical status of the Korean Strategy must be re-evaluated.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222