我国行政诉讼中间判决探究  

Research on Intermediate Judgment in Administrative Litigation in China

作　　者：王玎 WANG Ding(School of Law,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300380)

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学法学院,天津300380

出　　处：《甘肃高师学报》2019年第1期131-136,共6页Journal of Gansu Normal Colleges

摘　　要：在我国的裁判制度设置中,裁定的种类完善,而判决的种类却较为单一,但域外多国(地区)早已形成了较为成熟的判决体系,文章将对于此部分立法较为成熟的德国、日本以及我国台湾地区等制度作以分析比较,并且对于我国现状以及阻却事由作出分析,同时对于该制度可能产生的利弊价值予以权衡,此探究可适用于我国的的中间判决制度模式。In the setting up of the referee system in our country,the types of rulings are perfect,and the types of judgments are relatively simple.However,many foreign countries have already formed a relatively mature judgment system.This article will make an analysis and comparison of German,Japanese and Taiwan systems which are relatively mature in this part of legislation,and make an analysis of the current situation of our country and the reasons for its obstruction.At the same time,we should weigh the pros and cons of the system,so as to explore the model of intermediate judgment system which can be applied to China.

关 键 词：中间判决 比较研究 先决事项 自由心证 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学]