检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王耀东 朱锋[2] 李振 WANG Yao-dong;ZHU Feng;LI Zhen(Department of Stomatology, The First People's Hospital of Changshu City, Changshu 215500;Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu Province, China;Department of Oral Implant,Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu Province, China)
机构地区:[1]常熟市第一人民医院口腔科,江苏常熟215500 [2]南京市口腔医院口腔颌面外科,江苏南京210008 [3]南京市口腔医院口腔种植科,江苏南京210008
出 处:《口腔颌面外科杂志》2018年第1期45-48,共4页Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
摘 要:目的:对比云南白药局部使用与传统搔刮法治疗干槽症的临床疗效。方法:选取近4年来我科就诊的22例干槽症患者。前5例使用传统局麻下彻底搔刮拔牙窝,后使用碘仿纱条填塞的方法治疗;后17例非麻醉下轻度清理拔牙窝后,局部使用以云南白药为主的自制糊剂,充填拔牙窝治疗干槽症。结果:前5例中有4例通过传统治疗1周治愈,1例失败;后17例均在24h内症状缓解,1周后药物脱落后顺利取出,创口愈合良好。结论:自制糊剂药物疗法较传统搔刮治疗法,能更有效治疗干槽症,值得在临床工作中推广。Objective: To compare the therapeutic effect of Dry Socket(DS) between medicine treatment and traditional method. Methods: A total of 22 patients, who came to our department for DS in recent 4 years, were included in this study. The earlier 5 patients treated by traditional method were the control group, while the following 17 patients treated by mixed Yunnan Baiyao paste were the study group. Results: 4 patients in control group (total 5 patients) were cured by traditional method within one week, while one patient failed. All 17 patients in study group were relieved within 24 hours, and the wounds were self-healing and the medicine was self-releasing or was taken out successfully, within one week. Conclusion: This medicine can treat patients with DS more effectively and painlessly, comparing to traditional method. This simple and effective therapy is worth to promote in clinic treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43