检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕晓刚[1] LV Xiao-gang(Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,Hunan,411105)
机构地区:[1]湘潭大学,湖南湘潭411105
出 处:《湖南警察学院学报》2019年第1期84-90,共7页Journal of Hunan Police Academy
基 金:湖南省2017年社科基金基地项目"刑事和解制度调解机制构建研究"(17JD78)
摘 要:当前刑事和解制度存在当事人和解意愿不强,缺乏沟通渠道;办案机关调解资源有限,受制角色冲突;社会力量参与程度不足,缺乏衔接机制等问题。而调解机制所具备的缓和对立、信息沟通、促成共识、规范监督、社会参与等价值对于解决上述问题意义重大。根据域外经验和我国实践,刑事和解制度调解机制的构建方案应当包括调解主体的确定,调解方式的限定,调解范围的界定,调解程序的设置,保障措施的配置等。Nowadays in criminal reconciliation system, people do not tend to reconcile and are lack of ways to communication. Judicial authorities do not have enough resources to reconcile and are limited by role conflicts. Also social forces do not have enough participation and are lack of connection system. Conciliation is valuable in defusing tensions, exchanging information, promoting common views, improving supervision and advancing social participation. According to the experience oversea and the practice in our country, in order to improve the conciliation in criminal reconciliation, we should explicit the subjects, ways and scope of the conciliation, and set up the conciliating procedure and protection measures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28