检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王冬梅 王向宁 Wang Dongmei;Wang Xiangning(Department of Science and Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)
出 处:《科研管理》2019年第3期126-132,共7页Science Research Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(M1450028)
摘 要:目前,我国高校在科技评价中,普遍存在"注重数量、看轻质量"的问题,对科研成果、科技人员的不恰当的量化评价,并与利益挂钩,导致科研成果与社会的实际发展需求无法紧密的联系起来。尤其对于行业特色高校,行业背景浓厚,对科技成果的应用性要求较高,所以对于成果实际应用的考察应该成为行业特色高校科技评价指标中的关键部分。针对上述问题,本文对具有行业特色的高校科技分类评价开展了探索与研究。首先分析了当前科技评价的现状,探讨了当前行业特色高校科技评价的不足之处;然后基于科技评价的现状,本文提出了科技评价的三大基本原则:坚持分类评价、建立高效评价机制和建立特色评价体系。最后引入了灰色理论,研究了行业特色高校的科技评价模型,并且针对行业特色高校的特点,重点确定了分类评价指标,提出了关于行业应用、学术成绩和行业指导这3个方面共19项分类评价指标,同时提出借鉴英美等国家比较成熟的科技评价体系来完善我国行业特色高校分类评价的观点。At present,in the evaluation of science and technology in China’s colleges and universities,there are widespread problems of"focusing on quantity and despising quality". The inappropriate quantitative evaluation of scientific research achievements and scientific and technological personnel which are linked with interests leads to the fact that scientific research achievements cannot be closely linked with the actual development needs of society. Especially for the universities with industry characteristics,the industry background is strong,and the application requirements for scientific and technological achievements are highly demanded. Therefore,the investigation of the practical application of scientific and technological achievements should be a key part of the evaluation indexes for the universities with industry characteristics.In view of the above problems,this paper studies the classified evaluation of universities science and technology with industry characteristics.Firstly,this paper analyzes the current situation of scientific and technological evaluation,and discusses the defects of scientific and technological evaluation methods in colleges and universities with industry characteristics. There are many phenomena that people pay attention to good reputation rather than actual content,quantity rather than quality. The criteria for acceptance and evaluation of scientific and technological projects mainly depend on whether their results can be published in authoritative journals,but such criteria cannot truly and effectively reflect the real level of scientific research projects. The evaluation of scientific researchers mainly depends on the number of published papers and applied patents,and whether they have hosted or participated in major research topics,but they do not attach enough importance to the actual value of the results,especially some of the results cannot be applied to practice at all. This emphasis makes the current scientific research achievements of colleges and universities seriously o
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.151