基于ESI和Incites的潜力学科识别与评测方法研究进展  

Reviews of Identification and Evaluation of Potential Disciplines Based on ESI and Incites

作　　者：王晓文[1] 沈思[1] 崔旭[2] Wang Xiaowen;Shen Si;Cui Xu(Library of Xi’an University of Science and Technology,Xi’an Shaanxi 710054;Public Management College,Northwest University,Xi’an Shaanxi 710127)

机构地区：[1]西安科技大学图书馆,陕西西安710054 [2]西北大学公共管理学院,陕西西安710127

出　　处：《情报探索》2019年第4期105-108,共4页Information Research

基　　金：2018年度陕西省社科界重大理论与现实问题研究项目"陕西省属高校一流学科成长机理与实证研究"(项目编号:2018Z152);陕西省高等教育学会2017年度高等教育科学研究项目"基于多方法融合的ESI潜力学科识别与评测研究--以陕西8所省属高校为例"(项目编号:XGH1707);2018年陕西省科学技术情报学会"基于多源科技情报数据管理的科技创新路径研究"(项目编号:2018SKQP06)成果之一

摘　　要：[目的/意义]旨在为进一步促进潜力学科识别与评测方法研究提供参考。[方法/过程]对比分析各种预测方法的优缺点,找到该领域尚存在的问题与不足,并提出未来发展方向。[结果/结论]目前对评测方法的创新研究不够深入、理论与实际无法很好地结合、缺乏潜力学科的动态监测与评价方法。因此,应从学科发展的内在机理出发,在使用引文分析法进行学科科研评估的同时,考虑科研质量和实际贡献导向,预测学科未来可能取得的进展和突破。[Purpose/significance] The paper aims to provide references for promoting researches of identification and evaluation of potential disciplines.[Method/process] Through comparison and analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of various prediction methods,the paper discusses the problems and shortcomings,then proposes the future development direction of the method of potential discipline identification and evaluation.[Result/conclusion] At the present stage,the research on innovation of evaluation methods is not enough;the theory and practice cannot be well combined;dynamic monitoring and evaluation method of potential discipline are lacked.Therefore,based on the internal mechanism of subject development,we should consider the quality of scientific research and the orientation of actual contribution,in order to predict the possible progress and breakthroughs of the discipline in the future.

关 键 词：潜力学科 学科评价 ESI InCites 

分 类 号：G203[文化科学—传播学]