检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李诗杨[1,2] 但斌[1,2] 周茂森[3] 王大飞[1,2] LI Shi-yang;DAN Bin;ZHOU Mao-sen;WANG Da-fei(School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;Chongqing Key Laboratory of Logistics at Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;College of Management, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)
机构地区:[1]重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,重庆400044 [2]重庆大学现代物流重庆市重点实验室,重庆400044 [3]深圳大学管理学院,深圳518060
出 处:《管理工程学报》2019年第2期196-204,共9页Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71572020;71272086)
摘 要:针对当前网上售药渠道与传统售药渠道产生的矛盾冲突,在考虑我国药品限价政策与医疗机构公益性的基础上,构建了药品双渠道供应链模型分散式与集中式决策下的理论模型,分析、比较了限价政策、公益性等因素对均衡价格和系统绩效的影响;并针对药品双渠道供应链的特点,从渠道合作角度出发,设计了"指导定价+固定支付"及"政府补贴+指导定价+固定支付"的协调契约。研究发现:最高限价管制下,降低最高限价有利于提高供应链利润和社会整体福利;当药品价格不受管制时,增加医疗机构公益性有利于提高药品供应链利润和社会整体福利。当医疗机构公益性较低时,分散式决策供应链利润小于集中式决策,"指导定价+固定支付"契约可协调药品双渠道供应链;当医疗机构公益性较高时,分散式决策供应链利润大于集中式决策,"政府补贴+指导定价+固定支付"契约可协调药品双渠道供应链。The rapid development of pharmaceutical e-commerce provides a convenient and efficient way for self-medication. More and more pharmaceutical suppliers are distributing drugs through both medical institutions and online channels to increase profit. However, adding a new channel will damage the profit of medical institutions, which will cause channel conflict between the medical institutions and online pharmaceutical channel. Therefore, how to alleviate or eliminate channel conflict and realize supply chain coordination, as well as the win-win situation of supply chain members, is a serious problem needing to be solved. Aiming at the channel conflict in the pharmaceutical dual-channel supply chain, we establish theoretical models in the decentralized decision and the centralized decision of pharmaceuticals dual-channel supply chains respectively by taking into account China's pharmaceutical supply chain characteristics, such as the influence of price cap policy and public welfare. Then, we analyze the impacts of some parameters including price cap policy and public welfare and self-medication on the equilibrium results. From the perspective of cooperation between medical institutions and pharmaceutical suppliers, we proposed coordination contracts to realize the win-win situation between supply chain members and improve the social welfare under the dual-channel strategy of pharmaceutical suppliers. Finally, combined with the current pharmaceutical policy, we claimed the feasibility of coordination contracts and verified the effectiveness of the model on pharmaceutical dual-channel supply chain by the numerical examples. Firstly, we obtained equilibrium solutions of pharmaceuticals dual-channel supply chain under decentralized decision-making and analyzed the influence of the price-cap policy and public welfare on pricing strategies and systems performance. The result shows that when there exists a lower price cap, the optimal pricing of pharmaceuticals of medical institutions equals the price cap, and the price cap
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.169.109