检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄永恒 Huang Yongheng(Huludao Aoxin National Stomatological Hospital,Huludao,Liaoning,125000,China)
机构地区:[1]葫芦岛奥新全民口腔医院,辽宁葫芦岛125000
出 处:《当代医学》2019年第12期78-80,共3页Contemporary Medicine
摘 要:目的探索微创拔牙刀结合高速涡轮牙钻拔牙法在下颌近中阻生智齿拔除术的效果。方法选取2016年3月至2017年3月期间本院下颌近中阻生智齿拔除术100例患者,抽签化分组,即50例每组,对照组和观察组分别采用传统拔牙法和微创拔牙刀结合高速涡轮牙钻拔牙法治疗。结果观察组患者的并发症发生率(2.00%)、治疗后24小时疼痛评分(2.45±0.35)分、治疗后72 h疼痛评分(1.01±0.05)分、张口受限度(3.16±1.44)mm、肿胀度(14.78±2.66)mm、手术时间(13.17±1.38)min、满意度(98.00%)均优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论对下颌近中阻生智齿拔除术患者实施微创拔牙刀结合高速涡轮牙钻拔牙法治疗效果显著。Objective To explore the effect of minimally invasive extraction knife combined with high-speed turbine tooth extraction method in the extraction of mandibular proximal and middle impacted wisdom teeth. Methods One hundred patients with mandibular proximal and middle-effect impacted wisdom teeth extraction from March 2016 to March 2017 were selected. The grouping was performed in 50 groups, ie, 50 patients in each group. The control group and the observation group used traditional tooth extraction. The method and the minimally invasive extraction knife are combined with the high-speed turbine tooth extraction method. Results The incidence of complications in the observation group(2.00%), pain score at 24 hours after treatment(2.45±0.35), pain score at 72 hours after treatment(1.01±0.05), and mouth limitation(3.16±1.44) mm. The degree of swelling(14.78±2.66)mm, operation time(13.17±1.38)min, and satisfaction(98.00%) were superior to the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion The minimally invasive extraction knife combined with the high-speed turbine tooth extraction method is effective in the treatment of mandibular proximal impacted wisdom tooth extraction.
关 键 词:微创拔牙刀 高速涡轮牙钻拔牙法 下颌近中阻生智齿拔除术
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249