法官释明义务与诉讼类型的选择  

Judges' Explanatory Obligation and the Choice of Litigation Types

作　　者：钱方 QIAN Fang(School of Law,Anhui University Hefei,Anhui 230000)

机构地区：[1]安徽大学,安徽合肥230000

出　　处：《牡丹江大学学报》2019年第4期12-15,共4页Journal of Mudanjiang University

摘　　要：2014年《行政诉讼法》修改虽未明确规定诉讼类型,但其突出亮点就是形成了判决类型化。源于原告在行政诉讼中的弱势地位以及诉讼类型选择时的专业性,法官有义务对原告的诉讼选择进行解释和引导。我国学界关于诉讼类型化的呼吁一直未曾停止,但其中关于诉讼类型的转换、变更及其考量因素的研究却亟待深入。本文试图从释明义务和选择诉讼类型二者的关系出发,对诉讼类型选择过程中应当考量的因素以及释明权的边界作出探讨和阐明。Although the amendment of the Administrative Procedure Law in 2014 does not specify the types of litigation, its prominent feature is the formation of the typification of judgments. Because of the plaintiff's weak position in administrative litigation and the professionalism in the choice of litigation types, judges are obliged to explain and guide the plaintiff's choice of litigation. The appeal for the typification of litigation has never stopped in the academic circles of our country, but the research on the conversion, change and consideration factors of litigation types needs to be deepened urgently. Starting from the relationship between the obligation of interpretation and the choice of litigation type, this paper tries to discuss and clarify the factors that should be considered in the process of the choice of litigation type and the boundary of the right of interpretation.

关 键 词：行政诉讼类型 撤销之诉 义务之诉 确认之诉 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]