检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢少锋[1] 李丹阳 LU Shao-feng;LI Dan-yang(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
出 处:《太原师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2018年第6期65-68,共4页Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:刑事简易程序自诞生之时就承担着案件分流和缓和社会矛盾的重要作用,但司法实践中简易程序未能充分发挥其作用,难以突破固有模式。伴随着速裁程序、认罪认罚制度的建立,刑事审判程序框架逐步调整完善,简易程序应该重新确立自身地位。简易程序、速裁程序和认罪认罚从宽制度的协调运行,有利于我国刑事简易程序的重构及刑事审判程序的发展完善。Since the birth of criminal summary procedure, it has played the important role of case diversion and easing social contradictions, but the summary procedure in judicial practice has failed to give full play to its role and it is difficult to break through the inherent mode. With the establishment of the system of speed and plea penalty, the framework of criminal trial procedure enters the stage of adjustment and perfection, and the summary procedure should redefine its own status. To study the criminal summary procedure in our country, we can start from analyzing and comparing the characteristics of different trial procedures in our country, find out the difficult problems of program operation, and provide solutions for the reconstruction of criminal summary procedure and the development and perfection of criminal trial procedure in our country by discussing the coordinated operation mode of simple procedure, speed procedure and penalty leniency system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15