检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李琦 王佳宁[1] 赵思琦 贾彦茹[1] LI Qi;WANG Jianing;ZHAO Siqi;JIA Yanru(School of Education Science Harbin Normal University,Harbin 150025,China)
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨师范大学教育科学学院,哈尔滨150025
出 处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2019年第4期312-317,共6页Chinese Mental Health Journal
基 金:黑龙江省自然科学基金面上项目(G2016004)
摘 要:目的:检验错失焦虑量表(FoMOs)在大学生群体中的适用性。方法:选取哈尔滨市2所高校的大学生共1021名,其中553名(样本1)用于条目分析和探索性因子分析,468名(样本2)用于验证性因子分析和内部一致性信度检验。间隔2周后,在样本1中选取86名进行重测。在样本2中选取228名施测状态特质焦虑量表(STAI)、社交网站使用强度量表(FIS)检验效标效度。结果:探索性因子分析得到错失信息恐惧、错失情境恐惧2个因子,累积解释量表总变异量的57.42%;验证性因子分析显示模型拟合良好(χ~2/df=3.90,CFI=0.95,GFI=0.97,TLI=0.92,IFI=0.95,RMSEA=0.08);效标效度检验显示,FoMOs中文版与STAI、FIS得分均呈正相关(r=0.30、0.31,均P<0.001)。总量表的Cronbach α系数为0.72,2个因子的α系数分别为0.78、0.70;总量表的重测信度为0.85,2个因子的分别为0.80和0.66。结论:错失焦虑量表中文版在大学生样本中具有良好的效度和信度,可以作为评估大学生错失焦虑程度的工具。Objective: To examine the validity and reliability of Fear of Missing Out Scale ( FoMOs) in Chinese college students. Methods: Totally 1021 subjects were recruited in the study,553 college students ( sample 1) were recruited to complete the test version for item and exploratory factor analysis,468 college students ( sample 2) were tested with formal version for further confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency reliability. Totally 86 students from sample 1 were retested for test-retest reliability with two weeks interval. The criterion validity was tested with the State Trait Anxiety Inventory ( STAI),the Facebook Intensity Scale ( FIS) by choosing 228 students from sample 2. Results: The explanatory factor analysis produced 2 factors including fear of miss information and fear of miss situation. The accumulating explanatory rate of the 2 factors was 57. 42%,and the results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that FoMOs had a good construct validity (χ^2 /df = 3. 90,CFI = 0. 95, GFI = 0. 97,TLI = 0. 92,IFI = 0. 95,RMSEA = 0. 08). The FoMOs scores were extremely positively correlated with scores of STAI and FIS ( r = 0. 30,0. 31,Ps < 0. 001). Cronbach' s α coefficients were 0. 72 for the total scale and 0. 85 for the test-retest reliability. The internal consistency reliabilities for the 2 factors were 0. 78 and 0. 70,and the test-retest reliabilities for the 2 factors were 0. 80 and 0. 66. Conclusion: The revised Chinese Ver-sion of the Fear of Missing Out scale has good reliability and validity in Chinese college students,and it' s a reliable tool to assess the level of college students' fear of missing out.
分 类 号:R749.72[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28