检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张洁[1] 倪平[1] 邓欣[1] ZHANG Jie;NI Ping;DENG Xin(Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410008, China)
出 处:《现代医院》2019年第4期483-485,共3页Modern Hospitals
基 金:中南大学湘雅医院管理研究基金(编号:2017GL18)
摘 要:目的利用FOCUS-PDCA构建员工主动报告的不良事件上报体系,为持续提升医院质量与安全提供依据。方法根据FOCUS-PDCA,找出医院不良事件上报数低的根本原因,并针对改进,采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验进行统计分析,比较D阶段前后上报情况的差异,安全文化意识的变化,同时标准化有效措施。结果 D阶段较D阶段前,不良事件季度上报数增长2. 2倍,上报情况差异有统计学意义(H=10. 9,P <0. 05);员工对不良事件管理的认可率及支持率明显提升,排斥率明显降低。结论通过"评价办牵头、多部门联动"的管理模式,优化流程、宣传培训、经济奖励、及时处理,医院构建了较为完善的医疗安全(不良)事件上报体系,助力安全生产。Objective To provide some basis for continuous improvement of hospital quality and safety, we use FOCUS-PDCA to establish medical safety (adverse) event reporting system. Methods By using FOCUS-PDCA, the root cause of low report numbers of hospital adverse events was found, and targeted measures was implemented. By using Kruskal-Wallis H test, we compared the differences of reporting situation and safety culture consciousness before and after the “Do stage”, and standardized effective measures. Results Quarterly report numbers of adverse events in the “Do stage” increased 2.2 times compared to the “pre-DO stage”, and the difference was statistically significant ( H =10.9, P <0.05). The approval rate and support rate of employees for the management of adverse events were significantly increased, while the rejection rate was significantly reduced. Conclusion Through the management mode "led by the evaluation office and coordinated by multiple departments", the hospital has established a relatively well-developed medical safety (adverse) event reporting system to facilitate the safe production by optimizing process, publicity and training, financially rewarding and timely processing.
关 键 词:FOCUS-PDCA 医疗安全(不良)事件 上报体系
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117