学科评价省思:场域特性、价值趋向与制度构建——兼议一流学科建设评价  

Reflection on Discipline's Evaluation:Field Characteristic,Value Trend and System Construction——Concurrent on Evaluation of World-class Discipline Construction

作　　者：朱冰莹 董维春[2] Zhu Bingying;Dong Weichun(College of Humanities and Social Development,Nanjing Agricultural University;College of Public Administration,Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing 210095,China)

机构地区：[1]南京农业大学人文与社会发展学院 [2]南京农业大学公共管理学院,江苏南京210095

出　　处：《科技进步与对策》2019年第8期146-151,共6页Science & Technology Progress and Policy

基　　金：江苏省社会科学基金青年项目(17JYC001);青年骨干教师出国研修项目(201706855035)

摘　　要：当学科身处学术共同体与科层制组织二维空间时,学科评价便游离于行政与学术的二维坐标体系,二维场域内学科评价语境、主体、目标、方向、逻辑、标准及方法具有显著差异。当前,中国式学科评价呈现出行政场域强势介入与学术场域日渐式微相互嵌套的格局,从而抑制着学科建设主体的能动性及学科建设实践的创新性。一流学科建设成效评价应符合学科组织根本特性及学科发展客观规律。因此,遵循学科动态性与综合性特征,构建成长性评价模型;创新过程管理,彰显"学科人"话语权;发挥第三方力量,弱化行政管控性成为一流学科建设评价制度设计的应然选择。When discipline has been in two-dimensional space of academic community and bureaucracy organization,discipline evaluation of university dissociate on the two-dimensional coordinate system of administration and academic.Discipline's evaluation which on the administration and academic field have different characteristics in terms of evaluation context,subject,purpose,direction,logic,standard and method respectively.At present,the characteristic of academic field are declining while the characteristic of administration field is dominant on discipline's evaluation of China,which suppresses construction body's enthusiasm and construction practice's innovation. The evaluation of world-class discipline's construction should adapt to the fundamental characteristic of discipline and objective laws of discipline's development.Exploring the growing model of discipline's evaluation with following discipline's developing and comprehensive;innovating process management based on “discipline person' s participation;and exerting third-party-evaluation while weakening administration’s controlling are the necessary paths of evaluation mechanism of world-class discipline construction.

关 键 词：学科评价 行政思维 学术逻辑 成长性评价 一流学科建设 

分 类 号：G647[文化科学—高等教育学]