检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘琳 朱立强 赵利[2] LIU Lin;ZHU Liqiang;ZHAO Li(Department of Clinical Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou Jiangsu 221002;Department of Clinical Laboratory, Xuzhou Tumor Hospital, Xuzhou Jiangsu 221000, China)
机构地区:[1]徐州医科大学附属医院检验科,江苏徐州221002 [2]徐州市肿瘤医院检验科,江苏徐州221000
出 处:《临床与病理杂志》2019年第4期776-779,共4页Journal of Clinical and Pathological Research
摘 要:目的:观察肺癌患者血清中神经元特异性烯醇化酶(neuron-specificenolase,NSE)、癌胚抗原(carcinoembryonicantigen,CEA)、胃泌素释放肽前体(pro-gastrinreleasingpeptide,pro-GRP)的含量,分析NSE/CEA和pro-GRP/CEA在鉴别诊断小细胞肺癌(small cell lung cancer,SCLC)中的应用价值。方法:应用电化学发光法分别检测60例非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC;肺鳞癌22例、肺腺癌38例)及45例SCLC患者血清中的NSE,pro-GRP,CEA的含量,并计算NSE/CE A和pro-GRP/CE A。利用ROC曲线确定NSE/CE A和pro-GRP/CE A鉴别诊断SCLC的最佳界值。结果:NSE/CEA值在鉴别SCLC和NSCLC的ROC曲线下面积为0.90,敏感度为88.90%,特异度85.00%,最佳判断值为3.78。pro-GRP/CE A值在鉴别SCLC和其他两种肺癌的ROC曲线下面积为0.94,敏感度为86.70%、特异度91.70%,最佳判断值为28.61。结论:NSE/CEA和pro-GRP/CEA有助于鉴别诊断SCLC和NSCLC,有较高的应用价值。Objective: To evaluate the levels of neuron-specific enolase (NSE), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and pro-gastrin releasing peptide (pro-GRP) in the serum of patients with lung cancer and analyze clinical significance of NSE/CEA and pro-GRP/CEA ratio in the differential diagnosis of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Methods: Forty-five cases with SCLC and 60 patients with non-small cell lung cancer lung cancer (NSCLC), including 22 cases with lung squamous carcinoma and 38 cases with lung adenocarcinoma were selected.The levels of multiple serum tumor markers (NSE, CEA, pro-GRP) in the serum of patients were detected by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. And the ratio of NSE/CEA, pro-GRP/CEA were calculated. ROC curve was used to evaluate the best value of NSE/CEA and pro-GRP/CEA ratio in the differential diagnosis of SCLC. Results: At the threshold of 3.78, sensitivity and specificity of NSE/CEA as a serologic marker were 88.90% and 85.00%, respectively for distinguish SCLC and NSCLC. ROC curve showed that area under the curve (AUC) was 0.90. At the threshold of 28.61, sensitivity and specificity of pro-GRP/CEA as a serologic marker were 86.70% and 91.70%, respectively for distinguish SCLC and NSCLC. ROC curve showed that AUC was 0.94. Conclusion: Combined examination of multiple serum tumor markers and the NSE/CEA and pro-GRP/CEA ratio can effectively improve the accuracy in the differential diagnosis of SCLC.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117