2007-2017年我国中医护理培训现状的文献计量学分析  

Bibliometric analysis of traditional Chinese medicine nursing training between 2007 and 2017

作　　者：姚芳[1] 俞红[2] 张千坤 Yao Fang;Yu Hong;Zhang Qiankun(School of Nursing,Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine,Nanjing 210023,China;Department of Nursing,Suzhou Hospital of Tradit ional Chinese Medicine,Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine,Suzhou 215003,Chirui)

机构地区：[1]南京中医药大学护理学院,210023 [2]南京中医药大学附属苏州市中医医院护理部,215003

出　　处：《中华现代护理杂志》2019年第7期801-805,共5页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing

基　　金：苏州市科技局民生科技示范工程项目(SS201719).

摘　　要：目的了解2007—2017 年我国临床中医护理培训的现状及发展态势,为进一步规范中医护理培训及开展相关研究提供思路和指导。方法利用计算机检索CNKI、CBM、VIP以及万方数据库中在2007—2017 年期间发表并与中医护理培训内容相关的文献,运用文献计量学方法对上述文章进行定量分析。结果共检索出109 篇有效文献,近10 年发表文献大致呈上升趋势;共刊于54 种期刊上,其中收录于《北京大学中文核心期刊目录》文献占1.8%;第1 作者所在地以广东省、浙江省、江苏省居多;研究内容主要是各种培训方式在中医护理培训中的应用及对中医护理技术培训的探讨;文献合作度为 2.7人,基金资助率为32.1%;培训对象中低年资护士占61.9%,高年资及专科护士较少,社区护士仅占 3.7%;评价指标前5 位分别是护理理论考核成绩、操作考核成绩、护士满意度、患者满意度和护理质量评分。结论我国中医护理培训显得日益重要,但相关研究质量级别较低,研究的深度和广度不够,缺乏规范的研究设计和培训模式,借助移动信息平台方式较少,评价指标缺乏客观性和统一性。Objective To explore the status quo of clinical traditional Chinese medicine( TCM) nursing training between 2007 and 2017, and to provide a reference and guidance for further standardizing TCM nursing training and conducting relevant research. Methods The articles related to TCM nursing training which were published between 2007 and 2017 were retrieved from CNKI, CBM and VIP databases and analyzed using bibliometric methods. Results Totally 109 valid articles were found, and the number of articles published over the past ten years tended to increase;the articles were published on 54 journals in which those included in Chinese core journals of Peking University accounted for 1.8%;most of the first authors were from Guangdong, Zhejiang and Jiangsu provinces;the research mainly focused on the application of various training methods in TCM nursing training and the discussion of TCM nursing skills;the degree of cooperative authorship was 2.7 persons, and the funding rate was 32.1%;junior and intermediate nurses accounted for 61.9% of the training subjects, and there were a few senior and specialized nurses, with community nurses accounting for only 3.7%;and the top 5 evaluation indicators were theoretical performance, operational performance, nurse's satisfaction, patient's satisfaction and quality of nursing. Conclusions TCM nursing has become increasingly important, but the quality of relevant research is low. There is no in-depth and extensive research in this regard, nor standardized study design and training model. Few studies have used mobile information platforms, and the evaluation indicators are not objective or uniform.

关 键 词：医学 中国传统 文献计量学 培训 文献分析 

分 类 号：R-4[医药卫生] G353.1[文化科学—情报学]