第三人撤销之诉引入中间裁判制度研究  

Introduction of Interlocutory Judgement System to the Lawsuit Revoked by the Third Party

作　　者：乔茹 刘大伟[1] QIAO Ru;LIU Dawei(Law School,Liaoning University,Shenyang 110036,China)

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学法学院,辽宁沈阳110036

出　　处：《山东科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第3期72-77,共6页Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"案外第三人撤销之诉研究"(14BFX157)

摘　　要：追求程序正义是我国第三人撤销之诉建构的重要价值,为求与诉讼效率之平衡,应将中间裁判制度适当引入融合并借以完善第三人撤销之诉制度。中间裁判程序的启动可采取"释明启动意义"的前置制度;由原审作出生效裁判的法院管辖,中间裁判的审理优先并不可调解;中间裁判的适用范围,一是先于执行和财产保全等临时救济措施下的中间裁定,二是在多种诉讼请求存在之下要求确认法律关系存在之诉;对中间裁判的结果当事人无权上诉,救济方式为"复议前置与附带终局判决上诉制度",但应具备执行力。The construction of the lawsuit revoked by the third party aims at the pursuit of procedural justice.In order to improve the system,it is advisable to introduce the interlocutory judgment system for the balance of litigation efficiency.The interlocutory judgement system could start with a preposition system of“clarifying starting meaning”.It is managed by the court that has made the effective judgement.The hearing of the interlocutory judgment has priority and can’t be mediated.The interlocutory judgement system is applicable for the followings:first,the interlocutory judgment under the temporary remedial measures such as advance execution and property preservation;second,the lawsuit that asks for the confirmation of legal relationship under a variety of litigation claims;the litigants have no right of appeal for the result of judgement.The remedy is“reconsideration preposition and appeal system with final judgement”,but it should be of executive force.

关 键 词：第三人撤销之诉 程序正义 中间裁判 诉讼效率 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]