检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏伊慧 何烈伟 WEI Yihui;HE Liewei(School of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing,China 100088;Qiankun Law Firm of Beijing,Beijing,China 100016)
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088 [2]北京市乾坤律师事务所,北京100016
出 处:《昆明学院学报》2019年第2期93-98,共6页Journal of Kunming University
摘 要:由物联网、大数据与云计算为支撑的人工智能技术在司法领域得到了进一步运用,犯罪风险评估软件应运而生。一方面,犯罪风险评估软件在快速锁定犯罪嫌疑人、全面考量量刑信息方面发挥了重要作用;另一方面,犯罪风险评估软件则对刑事诉讼法的无罪推定原则、平等武装原则产生了一定的负面影响。如何在大数据背景下探寻高新科技所带来的高效便捷与刑事诉讼中保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的权利之间的平衡,是我们今日所面临的课题。Supported by the Internet of Things,big data and cloud computing,artificial intelligence technology has been further applied in the judicial field,causing the appearance of criminal risk assessment software. On the one hand, the criminal risk assessment software plays an important role in quickly finding out criminal suspects and comprehensively considering sentencing information. On the other hand,the criminal risk assessment software has a certain negative impact on the principle of presumption of innocence and the principle of equality of arms in the criminal procedure law. How to explore the balance between high efficiency and convenience brought by high-tech in the context of big data and protecting the rights of criminal suspects and defendants in criminal proceedings,is an important topic we are facing with today.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3