检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨位留[1] 杨金磊[1] YANG Wei-liu;YANG Jin-lei(School of Economics and Management,Zaozhuang University,Zaozhuang 277160,China)
机构地区:[1]枣庄学院经济与管理学院,山东枣庄277160
出 处:《兰州财经大学学报》2019年第2期43-54,共12页Journal of Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics
摘 要:研究企业成本粘性有助于打开成本管理的"黑箱"。本文以成本粘性的驱动因素为切入点,将2012—2016年沪深A股上市公司作为研究样本,探究管理者过度自信、两类代理成本与成本粘性之间的关系。研究结果表明,管理者过度自信与成本粘性显著正相关,第一类代理成本与成本粘性显著正相关,第二类代理成本与成本粘性的关系不显著。进一步利用因果逐步回归法和Bootstrap回归方法研究发现,第一类代理成本在管理者过度自信与成本粘性中存在显著的中介效应。Studying cost stickiness of enterprise could open the"black box"of cost management.Based on driving factors of the cost stickiness,this paper takes the A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2012 to 2016 as the research samples to explore the relationship between managerial overconfidence,two types of agency costs and cost stickiness.The results show that managerial overconfidence is significantly positively correlated with the cost stickiness.The first type of agency cost is significantly positively correlated with the cost stickiness.The relationship between the second type of agency cost and the cost stickiness is not significant.Further studies using causal stepwise regression and Bootstrap regression find that the first type of agency cost has a significant mediating effect both on managerial overconfidence and cost stickiness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3