检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:常永斌 张训[2] 吕庆宁 鲁冬冬 CHANG Yong-bin;ZHANG Xun;LU Qing-ning;LU Dong-dong(People's Procuratorate of Xiejiaji District,Huainan,Anhui 232052;Law School,Huaibei Normal University,Huaibei,Anhui 235000)
机构地区:[1]安徽省淮南市谢家集区人民检察院,安徽淮南232052 [2]淮北师范大学法学院,安徽淮北235000
出 处:《怀化学院学报》2019年第3期70-72,共3页Journal of Huaihua University
基 金:安徽省检察理论研究课题"监察机关职务犯罪调查与检察机关诉讼衔接机制研究"(AJ201803)
摘 要:厘清监察机关与司法机关案件管辖上的衔接,是落实国家监察体制的关键步骤。两者的衔接是建立在立法和运行两个视角上对现状进行考察,其存在案件管辖上的法律依据不足、相关办案职权范围界定的不明晰、案件管辖相关配套制度设计上的缺陷等问题。对此,提出完善案件管辖上的法律依据、明晰相关案件职权范围、细化案件管辖相关配套制度等相应建议。To clarify the connection between supervisory organs and judicial organs in case jurisdiction is the key step to implement the national supervisory system. The connection between the two is based on the legislative and operational perspectives to investigate the status quo. There are some problems in the jurisdiction of cases, such as the lack of legal basis, the unclear definition of relevant jurisdiction and the defects in the design of relevant supporting systems of case jurisdiction. In this regard,the article puts forward the legal basis for improving the jurisdiction of cases,clarifying the jurisdiction of relevant cases,and refining the jurisdiction of cases. Suggestions on the improvement of the supporting system are put forward.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30