检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吉婷婷 李成凤[1] 刘润[1] JI Ting-ting;LI Cheng-feng;LIU Run(State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300350,China)
机构地区:[1]天津大学水利工程仿真与安全国家重点实验室,天津300350
出 处:《水道港口》2019年第2期194-198,共5页Journal of Waterway and Harbor
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(51679162);天津市自然基金重点项目(17JCZDJC39900)
摘 要:海底管道在高温高压下的整体屈曲是管道设计中需要考虑的重要问题。由于地基土体对管道作用的非线性特点,使得求解高温高压下海底管道整体屈曲变形的理论解非常困难。摄动法和Galerkin法是求解海底管道整体屈曲的重要方法。文章在考虑土体对管道抗力的分析模型基础上对海底管道水平向整体屈曲变形的摄动法解与Galerkin法解进行了对比,发现两者得到的结果差异较小,但Galerkin法求解过程复杂,计算量大,且土抗力的函数表达式较为单一。The global buckling of submarine pipeline subjected high temperature and pressure is an important issue in pipeline design.Because of the nonlinear characteristics of pipe-soil interaction, it is very difficult to get an analytical solution for global buckling of submarine pipeline. Perturbation method and Galerkin method are important methods to solve the global buckling of submarine pipeline. On the basis of nonlinear soil resistance, perturbation method and Galerkin method for the lateral global buckling were compared in this paper. It is found that the difference between two results is small, but the Galerkin method is more complicated and cost a larger calculation .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.45.232