海底管道整体屈曲摄动解与Galerkin解的对比分析  被引量:1

Contrastive analysis of perturbation method and Galerkin method for global buckling of submarine pipeline

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:吉婷婷 李成凤[1] 刘润[1] JI Ting-ting;LI Cheng-feng;LIU Run(State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300350,China)

机构地区:[1]天津大学水利工程仿真与安全国家重点实验室,天津300350

出  处:《水道港口》2019年第2期194-198,共5页Journal of Waterway and Harbor

基  金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(51679162);天津市自然基金重点项目(17JCZDJC39900)

摘  要:海底管道在高温高压下的整体屈曲是管道设计中需要考虑的重要问题。由于地基土体对管道作用的非线性特点,使得求解高温高压下海底管道整体屈曲变形的理论解非常困难。摄动法和Galerkin法是求解海底管道整体屈曲的重要方法。文章在考虑土体对管道抗力的分析模型基础上对海底管道水平向整体屈曲变形的摄动法解与Galerkin法解进行了对比,发现两者得到的结果差异较小,但Galerkin法求解过程复杂,计算量大,且土抗力的函数表达式较为单一。The global buckling of submarine pipeline subjected high temperature and pressure is an important issue in pipeline design.Because of the nonlinear characteristics of pipe-soil interaction, it is very difficult to get an analytical solution for global buckling of submarine pipeline. Perturbation method and Galerkin method are important methods to solve the global buckling of submarine pipeline. On the basis of nonlinear soil resistance, perturbation method and Galerkin method for the lateral global buckling were compared in this paper. It is found that the difference between two results is small, but the Galerkin method is more complicated and cost a larger calculation .

关 键 词:海底管道 水平向整体屈曲 摄动法 GALERKIN法 

分 类 号:P756.2[天文地球—海洋科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象