论“艺术生产”的生产劳动性与非生产劳动性  

Artistic Production: Productive Labor or Non-Productive Labor?

作　　者：万娜 Wan Na(School of Chinese Language and Literature, Hubei Provincial Center for Literary Theory and Criticism,Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079)

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学文学院,湖北文学理论与批评研究中心,湖北武汉430079

出　　处：《华中师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2019年第3期92-98,共7页Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目"马克思主义文学批评的中国形态研究"(11&ZD078)

摘　　要：马克思在其思想成熟阶段对生产劳动和非生产劳动之间的关系进行了深入的思考,本文从三个方面对这一思考展开讨论:生产劳动和资本一般的关系,作为生产劳动与作为非生产劳动的文学艺术,以及艺术生产出现之后的艺术生产。通过对1857-1858年间马克思的经济学手稿做文本细读可以发现,马克思在思考过程中并没有对文学艺术究竟是"生产劳动"还是"非生产劳动"下断语,而是表现出徘徊于两者之间的姿态,表明他在处理文学艺术与资本之间的特殊关系时留下了弹性的理论空间。当下的艺术生产与马克思所处时代的艺术生产的资产阶级生产关系已经发生较大的变化,在新的历史语境中,重新审视并分析"生产劳动"和"非生产劳动"的关系,对于文学艺术在社会关系中获得更为准确的定位有重要意义。At the mature stage, Marx thought deeply about the relationship between productive labor and non-productive labor. This paper discusses Marx’s thinking from three aspects: the relationship between productive labor and capital in general, literature and art as productive labor and as non-productive labor, and the artistic production after emergence of artistic production. By reading the texts of Marx’s economic manuscripts from 1857 to 1858, it can be found that Marx did not conclude whether literature and art are "productive labor" or "non-productive labor". It shows that he has left a flexible theoretical space in dealing with the special relationship between literature, art and capital. The present artistic production has changed greatly compared to the time when Marx lived. In the new historical context, the relationship between "productive labor" and "non-productive labor" should be re-examined and analyzed carefully, so that literature and art could be repositioned well in social relations, which is significant for the development of the contemporary cultural industry.

关 键 词：生产劳动 非生产劳动 资本 艺术生产 

分 类 号：A811[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学] I0-02[文学—文学理论]