比较体育学方法论的相关问题研究  

Research on the Methodology of Comparative Physical Education and Sports

作　　者：李根 张建华[1] LI Gen;ZHANG Jianhua(College of Physical Education and Sports,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学体育与运动学院,北京100875

出　　处：《首都体育学院学报》2019年第3期206-210,共5页Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports

基　　金：北京师范大学青年教师基金项目资助(310422109)

摘　　要：学界近年来对比较体育学研究方法论的问题缺乏必要的讨论。运用文献资料法对比较体育学研究方法论的相关问题进行分析。研究表明,可比较性、跨文化性与跨学科性是比较体育学研究的3大特点。比较体育学研究具有创造知识价值与政策参考价值,形成了宏观与微观研究并重的研究取向。其分析层面不断拓宽,强调研究对象和数据及资料的可比性。横向比较法、纵向比较法与因素分析法是比较体育学研究的特色方法。比较体育学的研究方法应针对不同的具体研究问题选取适宜的研究方法。比较体育学是否具有独立的学科地位和存在价值,不能取决于它是否具有独立的、特有的研究方法,而其研究领域、范畴及理论视角,才是其作为独立分支学科的生命力所在。In recent years, there is a lack of necessary discussion about the methodology of comparative physical education research. By using the method of literature review, this paper analyzes the related issues of comparative physical education research. Comparative, intercultural and interdisciplinary are the three basic features of comparative physical education research. The research of comparative physical education has the value of creating knowledge and policy reference, and forms the research orientation of paying equal attention to macro and micro research. The continuous expansion of analytical units, the emphasis on the comparability of research objects and data are also issues that need to be paid attention. The methods of horizontal and vertical comparison and factor analysis are the characteristic methods of physical education research. The independent discipline status of comparative physical education is not depending on whether it has an independent and unique research method. The research field, category and theoretical perspective are its vitality as an independent branch discipline.

关 键 词：比较体育 比较方法论 比较体育学 研究领域 研究范畴 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]