检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯晓伟[1] 李向军[1] 冯莹 张晓燕[1] 张晓[1] 白九平 FENG Xiao-wei;LI Xiang-jun;FENG Ying;ZHANG Xiao-yan;ZHANG Xiao;BAI Jiu-ping(Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,Stomatological Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Shijiazhuang 050017,China)
机构地区:[1]河北医科大学口腔医院口腔颌面外科,河北石家庄050017
出 处:《河北医科大学学报》2019年第6期688-690,696,共4页Journal of Hebei Medical University
基 金:河北省医学科学研究课题(20191081)
摘 要:目的观察语音清晰度测试、头颅侧位X线检查和鼻咽纤维镜(nasopharyngeal fibroscope,NPF)检查3种方法对腭裂术后腭咽闭合功能的检测结果。方法应用语音清晰度测试、头颅侧位X线检查和NPF检查3种方法分别对30例腭裂术后患者的腭咽闭合情况进行检测并比较。结果将头颅侧位X线检查分别与语音清晰度测试和NPF检查进行配对χ~2检验,结果头颅侧位X线检出的术后恢复良好率与语音清晰度测试的术后恢复良好率以及头颅侧位X线检出的术后恢复良好率与NPF检查的术后恢复良好率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);语音清晰度测试的术后恢复良好率与NPF检查的术后恢复良好率差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05);头颅侧位X线检查与语音清晰度测试、头颅侧位X线检查与NPF检查、语音清晰度测试与NPF检查均呈中度一致。结论语音清晰度测试、头颅侧位X线检查和NPF检查3种方法对腭裂术后腭咽闭合功能检测的结果是一致的。Objective To compare the examination consistency of velopharyngeal function using speech assessment, cephalograms and nasopharyngeal fibroscope(NPF) after cleft palate operation. Methods The velopharyngeal closure of 30 patients with cleft palate after palatoplasty was detected and compared by three methods: speech intelligibility test, lateral cranial X-ray and NPF. Results The χ~2 test was used to compare the results of the three methods.There was no statistically significant difference between cephalograms and speech assessment(P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between cephalograms and NPF(P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between speech assessment and NPF(P>0.05). All examination results were moderately consistent. Conclusion The results were consistent of velopharyngeal functionalexamination using speech assessment, cephalograms and NPF.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145