检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵娟[1] 綦兵 贺婳茹 王雯娟[1] 关键红 ZHAO Juan;QI Bing;HE Huaru;WANG Wenjuan;GUAN Jianhong(Department of Hematology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an Shaanxi 710061,China;School of Medicine,Tianjin Medical College,Tianjin 300222,China;Department of Teaching,The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an Shaanxi 710061,China)
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学第一附属医院血液内科,陕西西安710061 [2]天津医学高等专科学校医学系,天津300222 [3]西安交通大学第一附属医院教学科,陕西西安710061
出 处:《继续医学教育》2019年第5期13-15,共3页Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的探讨形成性评价在口腔专业学生诊断学教学中的应用效果。方法选取西安交通大学医学部2016级89名口腔专业学生作为研究对象,随机选取45名作为实验组,采用形成性评价方式教学,余44名作为对照组,采用传统方式教学。结果实验组学生临床能力、操作考核和平时成绩均较高,总成绩高于对照组;实验组学生教学模式满意度高于对照组,学习兴趣、临床能力增加,团队协作能力和理论知识掌握程度增强(P<0.05)。结论形成性评价能够提高口腔专业学生诊断学的教与学质量。Objective To explore the effects of formative assessment in diagnostic teaching of stomatology. Methods 89 students of 2016 grade whose major were stomatology from Health Science Center of Xi’an Jiaotong University were selected as the research subjects. 45 students were randomly selected as the experimental group, using the formation evaluation method. The remaining 44 students were the control group and taught in the traditional way. Results The clinical ability, skill tests and scores of the experimental group were higher, and the final score was significantly higher than that of the control group. The teaching mode satisfaction of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, the interest in learning and clinical ability increased significantly, the ability of team collaboration and mastering knowledge obviously enhanced in experimental group(P <0.05). Conclusion Formative evaluation can improve the quality of diagnostics teaching and study.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222