检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:常红锦 吉迎东[1] 胡琳娜[1] Chang Hongjin;Ji Yingdong;Hu Linna(School of Management Science and Engineering, Shanxi University ofFinance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006,Shanxi, China)
机构地区:[1]山西财经大学管理科学与工程学院,山西太原030006
出 处:《科研管理》2019年第5期155-163,共9页Science Research Management
基 金:国家自然科学青年基金项目:"基于网络结构视角的创投网络与创新网络互动机理研究"(71702091);国家社科基金年度一般项目:"中国企业创新网络权力配置效率及其提升路径研究"(17BGL046);国家自然科学基金资助项目:"企业网络权力的形成机理;配置效率及其对合作行为的影响研究"(71872014);山西省软科学研究一般项目:"全球视角下山西科技创新中心微观区块化的创新机理研究"(2017041006-1)
摘 要:本文研究技术创新网络惯例各维度对关系机制的影响。对291家国内企业调查数据多元回归验证。结果显示,合作创新行为默契和创新网络规范共识提高企业间共同信任,促进关系承诺。但创新网络规范共识降低了关系嵌入水平,合作创新行为默契与关系嵌入之间的关系并不显著。With the rapid development of technology, it is difficult for a single enterprise to fully grasp the latest knowledge required for technological innovation. Therefore, the technological innovation activities of enterprises are increasingly relying on the innovation network to provide more valuable resources and information. The technology innovation network is a collection of relationships among member companies, which determines that the essence of its governance is the relationship governance between network member organizations. The key of whether the operation of the technology innovation network is successful is whether its relationship mechanism can ensure the simultaneous interaction and coordinated cooperation between the cooperative members. That is, the relationship mechanism is the core content of network organization governance. At present, many technology innovation companies have found that there are relatively stable routines in the technology innovation network. Network routines can coordinate the relationship between network members and promote inter-firm cooperation. For instance, Toyota relies on its unique culture and cooperation routines to achieve its relationship with partners in its knowledge sharing network. Therefore, technological innovation network routines have an important impact on the relationship mechanism between member companies.Although scholars have made some useful explorations on the relationship between network routines and relationship mechanisms, the existing researches still have the following shortcomings: The first, scholars have not yet analyzed the impact of different dimensions of network routines on relationship mechanisms. It has been suggested that the construction of the routines includes two aspects of behavior and cognition. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively understand the influence of technological innovation network routines on the relationship mechanisms from two aspects of behavior and cognition. The second, most scholars study the relationship
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31