中国学者研究中的“内亚”概念及其问题反思  

The Concept and Reflection of Inner Asiain Chinese Scholars’ Study

作　　者：祁美琴[1] 陈骏 Ql Meiqin;CHEN Jun(The Institute of Qing History,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学清史研究所,北京100872 [2]中国人民大学历史学院,北京100872

出　　处：《中国人民大学学报》2019年第3期163-172,共10页Journal of Renmin University of China

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“清代宗教与国家关系研究”(17JJD770013)

摘　　要：近年来,"内亚"及其"内亚性""内亚传统""内亚视角"等衍生概念成为中国历史学界讨论的"热词",但学界对有关概念的考订、辨析、认识和使用并未达成共识。尤其是"新清史"与"内亚视角"的交织和相互影响,使得"内亚"及其衍生概念的清理和反思日趋重要。中国学者在"内亚"概念下的研究对象和研究内容涉及地理、区域、民族、文化等诸多领域。但需要注意"内亚"概念在解释和使用中存在的随意性和不确定性,对"内亚性""内亚传统"等具有方法论价值的概念内涵与外延也需要更加明确的界定。在认识"内亚视角"的学术价值及其局限性的同时,应重视"中国性"概念的范式价值,并进而能在"内亚"与"中国"之间找到新的话语方式和更加符合中国历史实际的新历史观。In recent years, the concept of inner Asia and its derivatives such as Inner Asianess , Inner Asian Tradition and Inner Asian Perspective have become popular terms among Chinese historians, but there is no consensus on the textual research, analysis, understanding and use of the concepts. Especially, the interweaving and mutual influence between The New Qi ng History and the Inner Asian Perspective make it increasingly important to clarify and reflect on the concept of Inner Asia and its derivatives. On the basis of introducing the connotations of related concepts, this paper discusses the current use of the concept of Inner Asia and its problems existing in Chinese scholars' study. While reviewing the methodological significance of Inner Asianess and Inner Asian Perspective for holistic research, this paper points out the paradigm value of the concept of Chine sene ss. It advocates that the historians can find a new way of discourse between Inner Asian and China and a new historical view more consist with the reality of Chinese history.

关 键 词：内亚 内亚性 内亚视角 中国史 

分 类 号：K091[历史地理—历史学]