中国省域高校人文社会科学研究效率评价——基于Bootstrap-DEA分析  

Efficiency of humanities and social sciences research in Chinese colleges and universities:Based on the Bootstrap-DEA analysis

作　　者：王甲旬[1] 邱均平 WANG Jiaxun;QIU Junping(School of Information Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430079,P. R. China;China Academy of Scientific and Educational Evaluation Hangzhou Dianzi University,Hangzhou 310018,P. R. China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学信息管理学院,湖北武汉430079 [2]杭州电子科技大学中国科教评价研究院,浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第4期113-125,共13页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：2018年湖北省教育科学规划重点课题“湖北省高校人文社会科学研究评价”(2018GA002);2017年湖北省软科学项目“湖北省科技创新人才队伍建设研究”(2017ADC097)

摘　　要：本研究立足于分析2009-2016年中国高校人文社会科学研究的效率问题,其成果对于推进国家"双一流"建设,繁荣中国人文社会科学研究,乃至提升国际学术话语地位具有重要意义。研究主要采用Bootstrap-DEA方法,运用maxDEA和SPSS16.0进行数据处理,统计数据来源于中国高校人文社会科学信息网和国家统计局网站。研究发现,中国高校人文社会科学研究的整体技术效率处于中等偏上水平,且受到纯技术效率的影响较大,即科研管理对科研效率的影响较大。据此推断,科研资源配置能力和科研资源使用效率等内部因素是决定科研效率的主要因素。此外,研究发现地方经济发展水平与科研效率之间的相关性不显著。对比分析发现,各省市自治区直辖市之间及四大区域之间科研效率均存在明显差异。基于对研究结果的分析,笔者提出三点建议:制定区别于自然科学的人文社会科学研究管理制度;加大高校科研资源配置的自主权;优化人文社会科学研究评价标准和激励制度。This paper analyzes the research efficiency of humanities and social sciences of colleges and universities in China from 2009 to 2016. The significance of the research is to promote the "Double First-rate" strategical plan, and the humanities and social sciences research, and to improve the international academic status. The data come from www.sinoss.net and the website of the National Bureau of Statistics. Bootstrap-DEA method is used, and maxDEA and SPSS16.0 are used for data processing. It shows that the technical efficiency (TE) is relatively high on the whole, and the pure technical efficiency (PTE) has stronger influence on TE compared with scale efficiency (SE). It indicates that resource allocation ability and rate of resource utilization are the determinants of research efficiency. There is no significant correlation between the level of local economic development and research efficiency. Efficiency variances among provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions. Three proposals are tabled to improve research efficiency:to formulate a research management system distinct from natural science;to enlarge the right of self-management;to optimize evaluation standard of research and incentive mechanism.

关 键 词：科研效率 科研评价 高校 人文社会科学 DEA 科研资源配置 激励制度 

分 类 号：C12[社会学] G644[文化科学—高等教育学]