GUM法和MCM法评定叠鞘石斛多糖含量测定方法的不确定度  

Uncertainty Measurement Evaluation on Content Determinations of Polysaccharides in Dendrobium aurantiacum var.denneanum by GUM and MCM

作　　者：栗圣榕 廖莉 颜成功 胡攀 谢巧 夏厚林[1] 张廷模[1] LI Sheng-rong;LIAO Li;YAN Cheng-gong;HU Pan;XIE Qiao;XIA Hou-lin;ZHANG Ting-mo(Pharmacy College,Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Chengdu 61 1 137,China;Sichuan Wanan DendrobiumIndustrial Development Co. Ltd. ,Chengdu 610032,China;Chrngdu Institute of Chinese Herbal Medicine,Chengdu 610041 ,China)

机构地区：[1]成都中医药大学药学院,四川成都611137 [2]四川万安石斛产业开发有限公司,四川成都610032 [3]成都中草药研究所,四川成都610041

出　　处：《中药材》2018年第11期2605-2610,共6页Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials

基　　金：成都市科技项目(2015-NY02-00399-NC)

摘　　要：目的:利用GUM法和MCM法对叠鞘石斛多糖含量测定方法进行不确定度评定。方法:建立数学模型,采用GUM法和MCM法对本测定方法的不确定度进行评定并将结果进行比较。结果:MCM法所得95%包含区间为[15.28%,16.16%],GUM法与MCM法差异较大且GUM法未通过检验。结论:MCM法所得结果作为不确定度评定结果,叠鞘石斛多糖含量测定方法准确可靠。Objective:To evaluate the uncertainty of the content determination method of polysaccharides in Dendrobium aurantiacum var.denneanum by GUM and MCM.Methods:The mathematical model was established,and the uncertainty of the content determination method was evaluated by GUM and MCM,the results of GUM and MCM were compared.Results:The 95% coverage interval by MCM was[15.28%,16.16%],the differences of the uncertainty evaluation by GUM and MCM were significant and the uncertainty evaluation by GUM was not passed the test.Conclusion:The uncertainty evaluation by MCM is used as the final result.The method of content determination of polysaccharides in Dendrobium aurantiacum var.denneanum is reliable.

关 键 词：叠鞘石斛 蒙特卡洛法 不确定度评定 

分 类 号：R284.3[医药卫生—中药学]