检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王约然 WANG Yueran(Commercial and Economic Law School, China University of Political Science and law)
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院
出 处:《中国政法大学学报》2019年第3期142-153,208,共13页Journal Of CUPL
摘 要:虚假诉讼作为典型的民刑交叉法律问题,其有效解决,不仅应侧重维护司法秩序,更应高度重视权利的程序救济。这不仅关涉实体权利属性和程序功能属性的分离与整合,还牵涉诉讼成本和过程利益、既判力的合理扩张及第三人权益的兼顾与平衡。这些目标的实现,应在系统梳理我国现有虚假诉讼救济体系的基础上,分别从民事和刑事程序中寻求救济途径,以实现权利恢复和程序安定,进而结合侵权责任法的相关规定,设立虚假诉讼的损害赔偿之诉,在维护司法秩序的同时,实现当事人的权利救济与有效补偿。As a typical cross-law problem, the effective solution of false lawsuit should not only focus on maintaining judicial order, but also attach great importance to procedural relief of rights. This is not only related to the separation and integration of entity rights and procedural functions, but also involves litigation costs and process benefits, reasonable expansion of res judicata and balancing of third party rights. These goals should be systematically reviewed, on the basis of existing false litigation relief system in our country separately from the civil and criminal procedure to seek relief way, in order to realize the right to recover and process stability. Based on the relevant provisions of tort liability law, it is important to set up litigation of false damages, to maintaining judicial order and implementing the right remedy and effective compensation of the parties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15