论公司决议中的表决权回避  

On Exclusion of Voting Right in Corporate Resolutions

作　　者：高富平[1] 孔洁琼 GAO Fuping;KONG Jieqiong(College of Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai,200042)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院

出　　处：《扬州大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2019年第3期44-52,共9页Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：公司决议形成"公司意思"。表决为决议之必要环节,特别利害关系人表决权回避与否影响决议结果的确定,与决议成立和效力判断密切相关。表决权回避规则的设计应以"公司意思形成之保障"为立法意旨,将适用回避之"利益冲突"限于"非关于公司利益的个人利益"。对涉及表决人"自身事务"之回避应作强制性规定;"关联交易"情形下是否回避应根据表决权依据(股权或授权)之不同予以区分:限缩股东表决权排除的情形,强化其表决权行使的信义义务;对董事表决权排除作强制性规定。回避表决既应符合实体要件,亦应满足程序上的审查要求。违反表决权回避规则作出的瑕疵决议,可提起撤销之诉予以救济。A corporate resolution is a formation process of a company's will.Voting is an essential process in resolutions.Whether a member's voting rights should be excluded influences the outcome of a resolution,which is closely related to the establishment and effectiveness of resolutions.To design the rules of exclusion of voting rights should be aimed at the protection of the formation of company's will.The 'conflict-of-interest' should be confined to 'non-corporate individual interest'.Exclusion of voting rights involving the voting subject's own affairs should be regulated through mandatory provisions.In the situation of party transactions,it shall be distinguished according to the basis of voting rights,limiting the scope of exclusion of voting rights by shareholders,strengthening fiduciary duty of exercise of voting rights.Exclusion of voting rights of directors should be regulated through mandatory provisions.The exclusion of voting rights should not only be consistent with the substantive conditions,but also meet the procedural review requirements.Resolutions,which violate rules of exclusion of voting rights,could be revoked.

关 键 词：公司决议 表决权回避 利益冲突 程序审查 瑕疵救济 

分 类 号：DF411.9[政治法律—经济法学]