论民事执行和解司法审查的必要性及限度  

On the Necessity and Limits of Judicial Review of Civil Enforcement of Reconciliation

作　　者：翟业虎[1] 李川 ZHAI Yehu;LI Chuan(College of Law,Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijing,100000)

机构地区：[1]首都经贸大学法学院

出　　处：《扬州大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2019年第3期53-58,110,共7页Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：最高人民法院执行研究重点课题“执行和解与执行担保司法解释适用问题研究”(ZGFYZXKT201818B)

摘　　要：民事执行和解是债权人对既得权利的让步,在一定程度上实现了当事人意思对公法程序的突破,不可仅以当事人合意为其生效要件。分析执行和解协议的性质,厘清当事人意思自治的范围,考究执行效益与司法资源的保护,进而确认民事执行和解司法审查的必要性、落实司法审查的限度,进一步完善执行和解司法审查制度。Civil enforcement of reconciliation is a creditor's concession to the vested rights,which,to a certain extent,achieves the breakthrough in the public law procedure for the party's will and cannot only take the parties' agreement as its effective requirement.This paper analyzes the nature of the enforcement of the reconciliation agreement,clarifies the scope of party autonomy,examines the enforcement benefits and the protection of judicial resources,and then confirms the necessity of civil enforcement of judicial review of the reconciliation,puts the limits of judicial review into practice,and should be clear about enforcement of judicial review of the reconciliation in the law system.

关 键 词：执行和解协议 司法审查 执行法院 

分 类 号：DF718.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]