比较法视野下的文化遗产私人财产权法律保障模式研究  

The Mode of Private Property Rights Protection of Cultural Heritage in the View of Comparative Law

作　　者：梁岩妍 王小芳[2] Liang Yanyan;Wang Xiaofang(School of Law and Public Administration,Hebei Normal University,Shijiazhuang 050021,China;School of Law,Shanxi University ,Taiyuan 030006,China)

机构地区：[1]河北师范大学法政与公共管理学院,河北石家庄050021 [2]山西大学法学院,山西太原030006

出　　处：《石家庄铁道大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第2期90-95,共6页Journal of Shijiazhuang Tiedao University（Social Science Edition）

基　　金：2017年河北省社会科学基金青年项目“河北省历史文化名城、名镇、名村法律保护研究”(HB17FX023)

摘　　要：党的第十九大报告再次提出加强文化遗产传承与保护工作,然而近年来,我国出现诸多文化遗产公益与私权保障的冲突问题。很多国家或地区十分重视保障文化遗产相关的私人财产权,模式一般分为三种:以征收与权利限制补偿为主的政府直接管理模式、以贷款援助和税收减免为主的政府间接管理模式和将文化遗产委托企业与社团经营的社会多元主体治理模式。这三种模式为我国提供重要的借鉴意义:我国应当完善立法构建服务型政府,引导公众参与文化遗产保护,根据具体情况综合运用三种模式。The report of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China reiterated the inheritance and protection of Chinese excellent traditional culture. However,in recent years,there are many conflicts between the protection of public cultural heritage and the protection of private rights in China. Throughout the world,protection of private property related to cultural heritage is generally divided into three categories: direct government governance mode which is to levy and Compensate for the limitation of rights,the indirect governance mode which is mainly to loan aid and tax relief,and the social multi subject governance mode. The legislative and practical exploration in the above models can provide an important reference for our country. China should improve legislation to build service oriented government,guide public participation in cultural heritage protection,and apply three models according to specific circumstances.

关 键 词：文化遗产 私人财产权保障 政府管理 多元主体治理 

分 类 号：D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]