检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李佳臻 LI Jia-zhen(School of Law,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350,China)
机构地区:[1]南开大学法学院
出 处:《河北科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2019年第2期47-54,共8页Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences
摘 要:刑事立法和司法实践对公诉案件中被害人的权利保障相对薄弱,尤其在与被害人权益紧密相关的不起诉程序、认罪认罚从宽制度以及附带民事诉讼程序中体现更为明显。随着对犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的诉讼权利保障的进一步强化,与此对应的被害人权利保障问题不容忽视。应当从不起诉程序中被害人权利保障实质化、认罪认罚从宽制度中予以充分关注以及提升附带民事诉讼赔偿的可履行性角度,更加重视被害人的当事人地位,有效维护其合法权益,助推刑事诉讼目的之实现。The criminal legislation and judicial practice show that the victim's right is guaranteed weakly and the relief mechanism still has obvious defects,especially in the non-prosecution procedure,the system of leniency on admission of guilty and acceptance of punishment and the incidental civil action. The reform of criminal procedure system centered on trial and the amendment have further strengthened the defendant's right,but the victim's right should not be ignored.We should value the victim's status in proceedings and systems,which are directly related to the interests of victim and the realization of purpose.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145