检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄文伟[1] HUANG Wenwei(The Open University of Fujian at Quanzhou,Quanzhou Fujian 362000)
机构地区:[1]福建广播电视大学泉州分校
出 处:《宁波广播电视大学学报》2019年第2期28-34,共7页Journal of Ningbo Radio & TV University
摘 要:学生到学校接受教育,与学校之间会产生两种不同性质的法律关系:一是教育管理关系;二是平等主体的民事关系。我国现行的教育法规就其性质和内容而言,归属于行政法,平等性的教育合同关系缺乏明确的法律规定。各地法院在受理和判决教育合同纠纷案件中存在诸多矛盾之处,本研究详细分析学历教育合同纠纷案件的主要争议焦点和法院处理思路,并在此基础上提出教育立法应注意的若干问题。When students go to school to receive education, there occur two different types of legal relationships between them: One is the educational-administrative nature;the other being a civil relation between two equal agents. Based on their nature and contents, the existing educational laws and regulations fall into the category of administrative laws. The equality-oriented educational contract relationship lacks explicit legal stipulations. Consequently, abundant contradictions can be found in the dealing and verdicts of educational contract disputes, handled by courts across various regions. On account of a detailed analysis of the major dispute focus and court solution approaches in education contract disputes, this research attempts to highlight several noteworthy issues pertaining to the legislation of educational laws.
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222