检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郎嬛琳 黄知伟 LANG Huan-lin;HUANG Zhi-wei(School of Marxism,Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300070,China)
机构地区:[1]天津医科大学马克思主义学院,天津300070 [2]天津医科大学医学人文学院,天津300070
出 处:《医学与哲学》2019年第11期60-64,共5页Medicine and Philosophy
基 金:2017年天津市哲学社会科学规划青年项目(TJKSQN17-004);2018年中国法学会部级法学研究课题[CLS(2018)D137]
摘 要:“基因编辑婴儿”事件的发生反映了伦理调节的失灵和法律规范的缺位。从权利角度分析,此次事件伤害了被“编辑”的婴儿和后代人两类权利主体,包括他们的生命健康权、自主权、平等权等。同时,现行法律赋予两类权利主体的权利救济路径有限,导致维权困境的出现。为保护利益相关者的合法权利,法律应当结合技术的快速发展做出及时、恰当的回应和调整,相关权利保护法律体系应当实现合理构建和完善,法律责任的配置应当得到进一步加强和优化。The occurrence of "gene-edited baby" incident reflects the failure of ethical regulation and the absence of legal norms. From the perspective of rights, the incident infringed the rights of both of the gene-edited infants and future generations, including their rights to life and health, autonomy and equality. At the same time, the current law gives two types of rights subject limited right relief path, resulting in the plight of safeguarding rights. In order to protect the legitimate rights of stakeholders, the law should make timely and appropriate responses and adjustments in the light of the rapid development of technology. The legal system for the protection of relevant rights should be rationally constructed and perfected, and the allocation of legal responsibilities should be further strengthened and optimized.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13