检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘晓辉 赵庆华[1] 肖明朝[2] Xiaohui LIU;Qinghua ZHAO;Mingzhao XIAO
机构地区:[1]重庆市重庆医科大学附属第一医院护理部,400016 [2]重庆市重庆医科大学附属第一医院泌尿外科,400016
出 处:《中华护理杂志》2019年第6期902-907,共6页Chinese Journal of Nursing
基 金:中华护理学会2016-2017年度科研课题立项项目(ZHKY-201612);重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究项目(16SKGH021)
摘 要:目的结合服务质量差距模型,构建护理院失能老年人长期照护服务质量评价指标体系。方法通过查阅文献、半结构式访谈、德尔菲法及层次分析法确立针对护理院失能老年人的长期照护服务质量评价指标体系。结果 2轮函询问卷的有效回收率分别为100.0%和85.7%,专家权威系数为0.885和0.875,肯德尔和谐系数为0.252和0.275。最终确立的护理院失能老年人长期照护服务质量评价指标体系包括10项一级指标、21项二级指标和66项三级指标。结论构建的护理院失能老年人长期照护服务质量评价指标体系具有较高的科学性,可为护理院失能老年人长期照护质量的评价及服务指南的制定提供参考。Objective Combining Service Quality Gap Model to construct a quality evaluation index system for long-term care for disabled elderly in nursing home.Methods Through literature review,semi-structured interviews,Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process,the quality evaluation indicators for long-term care for disabled elderly in nursing home were established.Results The effective recovery rates of two rounds inquiry were 100.0% and 85.7%,respectively.The expert authority coefficients were 0.885 and 0.875.The coordination coefficients were 0.252 and 0.275.The final evaluation indicators for long-term care of disabled elderly in nursing home included 10 first-level indicators,21 second-level indicators,and 66 third-level indicators.Conclusion The quality evaluation index of long-term care for disabled elderly in nursing home is highly scientific,which can provide reference for further development of evaluation criteria and service guidelines for long-term care quality of elderly patients with disability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3