如何破解正义底线与血缘亲情的冲突悖论?——与黄启祥教授商榷“父子相隐”的命题  

How to Solve the Conflicting Paradox between Justice and Consanguinity:A Discussion with Professor Huang Qixiang about the Statement of “Father and Son Screen Each Other”

作　　者：刘清平 Liu Qingping

机构地区：[1]复旦大学社会科学高等研究院

出　　处：《文史哲》2019年第4期28-37,165,166,共12页Literature,History,and Philosophy

摘　　要：黄启祥教授撰文指出,孔子在"父子相隐"的命题里并未提倡父子"互隐其恶",而是提倡"隐父而非隐罪"以彰显"正义的家庭属性和主动的道义担当"。但仔细分析会发现,这种新颖的解读既脱离了《论语》的文本基础,也缺乏充分的论证理据,同时还与黄文自觉认同的"不坑害人"的规范性立场相冲突,结果陷入了自败悖论而无法成立。Professor Huang Qixiang points out in his article that what Confucius wants to say in his statement of “father and son screen each other” is not that father and son should covers up their crimes each other,but that father and son should take the blame for each other,and he thereby highlights the “family attributes of justice and moral responsibilities.” However,a careful analysis could show that this unique understanding of the statement distorts the original context of the Analects,is lack of its own justification of arguments,and even contradicts with the normative position of “no harm to fellow humans” identified by Professor Huang in his article.As a result,Professor Huang's article fall into some self-defeating paradox in this issue.

关 键 词：儒家 父子相隐 血缘亲情 正义底线 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学] B823.1[哲学宗教—伦理学]