在臆想与真实之间:黄遵宪《朝鲜策略》新论  

Between Assumption and Reality:A New Discussion of Huang Zunxian’s Korean Strategy

作　　者：张礼恒 Zhang Liheng

机构地区：[1]聊城大学历史文化学院

出　　处：《文史哲》2019年第4期60-73,166,共15页Literature,History,and Philosophy

基　　金：2013年山东省社科规划重大项目“从闭关到开放:朝士视察团研究”(13BLBSJ02)的阶段性成果;韩国东北亚历史财团资助

摘　　要：黄遵宪所著《朝鲜策略》并非如中外史家所褒奖的那样完美,而是存在着逻辑上的严重缺陷,将臆想中的"俄国威胁论"当成了现实中的"俄国威胁",将一种潜在的、可能的变量,视为一种业已发生、存在的事实。这种以臆想抑或推演代替现实的论证方式明显带有牵强附会的意味,叠加了极强的主观意志,纯粹是为现实目的服务的"先入为主"之见,究其实不过是为了配合清政府调整对朝鲜政策的应景之作。立论的先天不足或缺陷,必然影响到黄遵宪所提方案的严谨性、准确性,其"结日本"抵御俄国的主张,明显存在着战略上的误判,对其个人尤其是其《朝鲜策略》的历史地位与价值必须重新评判。Huang Zunxian's Korean Strategy is not as perfect as praised by the Chinese and foreign historians,but there are logically serious defects.He assumed the Russian threat as the reality,and took a potential variable as the fact that had occurred.It is obviously farfetched that this arguments replace reality with assumption or deduction,superposing the extremely subjective will.Therefore,It is entirely such a works with pre-conceived ideas that is suitable for the practical needs,in fact that Qing government intended to adjust the policy towards Korea.Being congenitally deficient,the arguments inevitably affect the preciseness and accuracy of Huang's schemes that claims alignment with Japan against Russia,which obviously is strategic miscalculation.And so,it is necessary for him and especially his Korean Strategy that reexamine their historical position and value.

关 键 词：《朝鲜策略》 黄遵宪 何如璋 "俄国威胁论" 

分 类 号：D829.312.5[政治法律—政治学]