《古文苑》与《文选补遗》赋选观异同论  

Fu Selection Concept of Gu Wen Yuan(古文苑)and Wen Xuan Bu Yi(文选补遗):A Comparison

作　　者：彭安湘[1] 王婧 PENG An-xiang;WANG Jing(College of Liberal Arts,Hubei University,Wuhan 430062,China)

机构地区：[1]湖北大学文学院

出　　处：《辽东学院学报（社会科学版）》2019年第4期1-8,共8页Journal of Liaodong University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：2016年湖北省社会科学基金项目(2016039);2019年教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目(19YJA751031)

摘　　要：《古文苑》与《文选补遗》,既是《文选》在唐宋影响流布的后续结果,又是试图突破《文选》模式体现选本个性的有益尝试。两者在选赋意图、选赋时段、编排体例、评注形式等方面颇为相似,共同传达出"以古为尊、以小为尚"的赋选观。但更多的是呈现出:探讨赋源有"尊荀"与"崇宋",列赋次序有重文和尚质,赋家去取有衡文与量德,选赋定篇有尚用与重情的四大区别。这种赋选观上的重大分野主要与编撰者"文术自有主张"的编撰意图密切相关,并因此带来两者在"选学"体系中不同的传播命运。While Gu Wen Yuan (古文苑) and Wen Xuan Bu Yi (文选补遗) were written in the Tang and Song dynasties under the influence of Wen Xuan (文选),they had specific characters different from the mode of Wen Xuan (文选).With similar Fu selection intention,time,layout style and comment form,they demonstrate a common concept of respecting to the ancient Fu and small-piece Fu.Nevertheless,they have differences on the ideas of Fu origin,arrangement order,Fu writer selection standard and choice of the works.The major difference of selection concept is closely related to the compiling intention of the writer' s own opinion,and thus results in different spread of them in the study field of Wen Xuan(文选).

关 键 词：《古文苑》 《文选补遗》 赋选观 选本批评形态 

分 类 号：I207.224[文学—中国文学]