法律文化视野下司法正义实现的路径选择——以呼格吉勒图案和辛普森案切入分析  

The Path Choice of Judicial Justice Realization from the Perspective of Legal Culture——Analysis of the case of Hugue Gillet and Simpson

作　　者：梁超[1] 祁天姿 LIANG Chao;QI Tianzi(Shan Dong University,Qingdao 266200,China;Qinghai Nationalities University,Xining 810000,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学,山东青岛266200 [2]青海民族大学,青海西宁810000

出　　处：《金华职业技术学院学报》2019年第4期70-74,共5页Journal of Jinhua Polytechnic

基　　金：2016年度云南省大学生创新创业训练计划项目国家级课题“云南省反家庭暴力庇护所现状调查及平台建构研究”(201610673008)

摘　　要：20世纪末,中美两国出现呼格吉勒图案和辛普森案两个相似的案件,但却出现了完全迥异的判决结果。两国对于案件的审理和裁决本质上都诠释了对司法正义的追求,但对于追求司法正义所付出的代价却有不同的认识和选择。本文采用比较法学方法,从程序正义与实体正义、惩罚犯罪与保障人权、权利本位与义务本位等角度入手,对中美两国的法律文化进行对比分析,探求实现司法正义的最终途径。At the end of the 20th century,there were two similar cases,namely Hugjiler pattern and the Simpson case respectively in China and the United States,but there were completely different judgments.The trials and rulings of the two countries have essentially interpreted the pursuit of judicial justice,but they have different understandings and choices for the cost of pursuing judicial justice.This paper uses the method of comparative law to analyze the legal culture of China and the United States from the perspectives of procedural justice and substantive justice,punishing crime and guaranteeing human rights,rights-based and obligation-based,and explores the ultimate way to achieve judicial justice.

关 键 词：中美法律文化 呼格吉勒图案 辛普森案 司法正义 

分 类 号：D915[政治法律—诉讼法学]