《素问》异文考证三则  

Three Textual Research on Alternative Script in Plain Questions

作　　者：邓海霞 蒋重母 DENG Hai-xia;JIANG Zhong-mu(School of Literature and Law,East China University of Technology,Nanchang,330000,China)

机构地区：[1]东华理工大学文法学院

出　　处：《南京中医药大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第2期87-92,共6页Journal of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：《素问》一书距今久远,在流传过程中,增删改易情况复杂,异文材料丰富。如何判定异文材料的正确与否,常常是见仁见智,彼此难以说服。以《素问》“杂合(离合)”“杂术(离术)”“铸锥(铸兵)”三组异文为例,参考同时代的文献,提供大量书证加以确证。The book the Basic Questions has a long history. In the process of its circulation, it has undergone complicated modifications including adding, deleting, adapting and amending. Therefore there are abundant variations. How to judge the correctness of variations is entirely a matter of preference. Taking "za-he (li-he)","za-shu (li-shu)" and "zhu-zhui (zhu-bing)" in the Basic Questions as examples, we discriminated the three variations with reference to the contemporary literatures and provided variable documentary evidence as supporting material.

关 键 词：素问 古籍整理 异文考证 

分 类 号：R221.1[医药卫生—中医基础理论] H13[医药卫生—中医学]