检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵君[1] 刘娜[2] 沈末伦 高超 郝新河[1] Zhao Jun;Liu Na;Shen Mo-lun;Gao Chao;Hao Xin-he(Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,Hefei Stomatology Hospital,Anhui Hefei 230001,China;The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Anhui Hefei 230022,China)
机构地区:[1]合肥市口腔医院安徽医科大学合肥口腔临床学院口腔颌面外科,安徽合肥230001 [2]安徽医科大学第一附属医院口腔科,安徽合肥230022
出 处:《全科口腔医学电子杂志》2019年第23期5-6,24,共3页Electronic Journal of General Stomatology
基 金:合肥市科技攻关计划(自筹)(合科[2015]163号61);2017年合肥市自主创新政策“借转补”项目(YW201710120006)
摘 要:目的探讨上颌正中埋伏多生牙的最优治疗时机。方法将33例患者按年龄分为三组,比较各组患者手术时间、术后肿胀、疼痛的发生情况。结果Ⅰ组(7岁≤Ⅰ组≤8岁)患者手术时间最短,为17.50±6.45min,Ⅲ组(>9岁组)时间最长,为47.33±13.35min,各组差异经统计分析,均具有显著差异,P<0.05。结论7岁至8岁时是拔除上颌前牙区埋伏多生牙最好的时机。Objects To explore the optimal treatment time of the impacted supernumerary teeth between the central maxillary incisors.Methods 33 patients were randomly divided into 3 groups according to age.The operation time,postoperative swelling and pain of each group were compared.Results The average operation time of Ⅰ group patients(7years old ≤Ⅰ group ≤8 years old) was shortest(17.50±6.45min),the average operation time of Ⅲ group patients (>9 years old) was longest(47.33±13.35 min),(P<0.05).Conclusion It is the best time to take out the impacted supernumerary teeth between the central maxillary incisors from 7 years old to 8 years old.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.52