从庭审宣判话语的词语选择及语调特征看法官权力的实施  

A Study of Implementation of Judge’s Power based on Lexical Selection and Intonation Features in Courtroom Trials

作　　者：陈海庆[1] 刘文婕 CHEN Haiqing;LIU Wenjie(School of Foreign Languages,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian Liaoning 116023,China)

机构地区：[1]大连理工大学外国语学院

出　　处：《广东外语外贸大学学报》2019年第3期12-20,共9页Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“中国当代庭审话语语调表征及其信息效果研究”(15BFX066)

摘　　要：在庭审判决阶段,法官对词语的选择往往彰显出其权力的合法性和权威性,因而其话语权也绝对高于其他庭审参与者。以2016-2018年国内庭审案件宣判音频资料为语料,运用NLPIR语义分析系统和Praat语音分析软件,对刑事庭审法官宣判话语中称谓语的使用频率、带情感色彩词语以及强调性话语的使用情况进行了实证分析,结果表明,称谓词在法庭宣判时总是被重读,这一特征表现了法官极大的话语权力;情感色彩词汇的使用主要表现为法官对被告人在道德上的谴责,以此实现司法公正。此外,强调性话语的使用也是宣判时法官权力的实施的重要途径,显示了法官的主导和支配地位。In the stage of sentence, the selection of words demonstrates the legitimacy and authority of judges power, so the discourse power of judges is absolutely higher than that of other trial participants. By adopting NLPIR (Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval) to examine the use of appellation, words with emotions and emphatic words judges use, this paper analyzes the transcriptions of utterances in criminal court trials carried on from 2016 to 2018 and reveals the intonation features of them in courtroom as well as the ways to indicate discourse power of judges with the help of Praat. The results show that appellations are always accentuated by judges in the process of sentences, which verifies the judges huge discourse power in criminal cases. Words with emotions are mainly used to condemn the accused morally and maintain judicial fairness. In addition, using emphatic words is also an important way to implement judges power during sentences, which shows the dominant position of judges.

关 键 词：宣判话语 法官权力 词语选择 语调 

分 类 号：D90-O55[政治法律—法学理论]