检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马凤春[1] MA Feng-chun(School of Criminal Justice,Shandong University of Political Science and Law,Jinan 250014,China)
机构地区:[1]山东政法学院刑事司法学院
出 处:《浙江工商大学学报》2019年第4期33-42,共10页Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“法律文明史”(11AZD050);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“从‘比’到‘例’:传统中国法变通形式研究”(16YJC820025)
摘 要:立法解释是在法律施行的过程中,立法机关对法律用语所作的阐释。立法解释存在诸多缺陷。从宏观角度而言,立法解释既不符合民主原则,也不符合法治原则,是规则中心主义的体现,其内容与司法解释内容高度趋同。从微观角度而言,立法解释不当地介入诸多问题。司法解释完全可以取代立法解释,其质量可以得到监督和保障,同时,人们应当坚持客观解释的立场。Legislative interpretation refers to the interpretation of legislative terms by the legislature in the process of law enforcement.Legislative interpretation has many drawbacks.From a macro point of view,legislative interpretation does not conform to the principle of democracy,nor does it conform to the principle of rule of law.It is the embodiment of rule-centrism,and its content is highly similar to that of judicial interpretation.From the microcosmic point of view,legislative interpretation improperly intervenes in many problems.Judicial interpretation can completely replace legislative interpretation,and its quality can be supervised and guaranteed.At the same time,people should adhere to the position of objective interpretation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28