检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭继民 GUO Jimin
机构地区:[1]宜宾学院四川思想家研究中心
出 处:《阅江学刊》2019年第4期72-79,123,共9页Yuejiang Academic Journal
摘 要:在哲学史上,有三组辩题对人们的思维方式产生了深刻的影响。这三组辩题分别由古希腊的芝诺、中国先秦名家和南北朝时期佛学代表人物僧肇提出。三组辩题虽分属于三种文化系统,却有着一定的同构性,尤其表现在对时空观念的认识上。通过探析三组辩题及其解答方式,横向比较寻找其会通之处,可知这三组辩题皆凸显了所属文化的逻辑思维方式;表达了先哲对现象的质疑和对本质的探求;对时空观、运动观的探讨提高了人们的逻辑思维能力,深化了人们对世界的认识。In the history of philosophy, there are three types of arguments that profoundly influence people s way of thinking. These three kinds of arguments were proposed by Zeno of ancient Greece, famous Chinese in pre-Qin Dynasty and representatives of Buddhism in the Southern and Northern Dynasties. Although those three types of thesis belong to three diferent cultural systems, they have certain isomorphism, especially in the view of the concept of time and space. The paper analyzes the three types of arguments and their solutions through horizontal comparison to find the point where it can pass. We think that the three types of arguments all highlight the logical way of thinking of the culture and expresses the question of the philosopher s questioning and the exploration of the essence. The discussion of time and space and the concept of movement have improved people s logical thinking ability and deepened people s understanding of the world.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3