检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘加海 郭晶 张欣旭 周亮[2,3] LIU Jiahai;GUO Jing;ZHANG Xinxu;ZHOU Liang(Xiang Ya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410005, China;Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), Guangzhou 510370, China;Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Translational Medicine Mental Disorders, Guangzhou 510370, China)
机构地区:[1]中南大学湘雅公共卫生学院,长沙410005 [2]广州医科大学附属脑科医院(广州市惠爱医院),广州510370 [3]广东省精神疾病转化医学工程技术研究中心,广州510370
出 处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2019年第7期519-523,共5页Chinese Mental Health Journal
基 金:美国自杀预防基金(AFSP)资助(SRG-0-169-12)
摘 要:目的:修订8条目自杀意图量表(SIS-8),并探讨其在农村老年人中的适用性。方法:以242位农村老年自杀死亡者的配偶、子女或没有血缘关系但熟悉自杀者的村民为信息人。对数据进行条目分析、探索性因子分析;采用Beck绝望量表简版(BHS-4)、老年抑郁量表(GDS)和ULS-6孤独感量表(ULS-6)评价聚合效度;比较不同人口学资料、自杀行为特征及有无精神障碍老年人的量表得分来评价实证效度。结果:经条目分析后,删除SIS-8的条目4(寻求帮助)、7(自杀遗书)、8(死前沟通),形成5个条目的量表SIS-5。探索性因子分析提取出防范和计划2个公因子,累计解释方差的68.38%;SIS-5得分与BHS-4、GDS、ULS-6得分均呈正相关(r=0.23、0.21、0.15,均P<0.001);有精神障碍的自杀死亡者SIS-5得分高于无精神障碍自杀死亡者(P<0.05)。总量表的Cronbach α系数为0.68,防范和计划2个因子的α系数为0.67、0.69。结论:8个条目的自杀意图量表(SIS-8)经修订后形成SIS-5。SIS-5具有良好的信效度,适合用于农村老年人自杀意图的评估。Objective:To revise the Suicide Intent Scale with 8 items(SIS-8) and explore its applicability among the elderly in rural areas.Methods:The spouses,children of 242 rural elderly suicide victims or villagers who were not related but familiar with suicides were informants.The frequency distribution,extreme group test,total item correlation and Crowns Bach coefficient method were used for item analysis.Exploratory factor analysis was used to evaluate the structural validity.The convergent validity of the scale was evaluated with the shorter version of Beck Hopelessness Scale(BHS-4),Geriatric Depression Scale(GDS) and the short-form of the UCLA Loneliness Scale(ULS-6);the scores of suicide intention among different demographic data,suicide characteristics and mental disorders were compared.Results:After item analysis,item-4(getting help),7(suicide note),8(communication) of SIS-8 were deleted and SIS-5 was finally formed.Exploratory factor analysis extracted 2 common factors of prevention and planning,accounting for 68.38% of the cumulative explanatory variance.SIS-5 scores were positively correlated with scores of BHS-4,GDS,and ULS-6(r=0.23,0.21,0.15,Ps<0.001).SIS-5 scores were higher in suicide victims with mental disorders than in those without mental disorders(P<0.05).The Cronbach’ s αcoefficients were 0.68 for the total scale and 0.67 and 0.69 for the two factors(i.e.prevention and planning).Conclusion:The Suicide Intent Scale for 8 Items(SIS-8) is revised to form SIS-5.SIS-5 has good reliability and validity,which is suitable for the evaluating suicide intention in rural elderly.
分 类 号:B841.7[哲学宗教—基础心理学] R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222