第二受害者经验及支持量表的汉化与信效度评价  

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool(SVEST)

作　　者：陈贵儒 孙慧敏[1] 黄蓉蓉 李晓莉[2] 邵雨娜 Chen Guiru;Sun Huimin;Huang Rongrong;Li Xiaoli;Shao Yuna(Nursing Department,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430071,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学中南医院护理部,湖北武汉430071 [2]阿坝藏族羌族自治州人民医院

出　　处：《护理学杂志》2019年第14期73-77,共5页Journal of Nursing Science

摘　　要：目的对第二受害者经验及支持量表进行汉化,并检验其信效度。方法经源量表作者授权,对第二受害者经验及支持量表进行翻译与回译,采用便利抽样法对258名综合性三级甲等医院临床执业护士进行问卷调查。结果第二受害者经验及支持量表的Cronbach′sα系数为0.892,各维度Cronbach′sα系数为0.444~0.916,内容效度指数为0.950。验证性因子分析得到卡方/自由度(χ^2/df)=2.299、比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.879、非规范拟合指数(TLI)=0.856、渐进残差均方和平方根(RMSEA)=0.071,均达到适配(拟合)标准。结论汉化版第二受害者经验及支持信效度良好,可用于评价我国临床执业护士作为第二受害者的经验及支持状况。Objective To translate the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool(SVEST)into simplified Chinese and to test the reliability and validity.Methods After obtaining authorization from the creator,we translated the SVEST into simplified Chinese and conducted back-translation,then selected 258 clinical nurses using convenience sampling method to complete the questionnaire.Results The Cronbach′sαcoefficient for the total scale was 0.892 and for the dimensions ranged from 0.444 to 0.916.The content validity index(CVI)was 0.950.Confirmatory factor analysis(CFA)indicated that the nine-factor model provided the best fit(χ^2/df=2.299,comparative fit index=0.879,Tucker-Lewis index=0.856,and root mean square error of approximation=0.071).Conclusion The simplified Chinese version of the SVEST is reliable and valid to assess the second victim experience and support of clinical nurses in China.

关 键 词：护士 第二受害者经验及支持量表 不良事件 患者安全事件 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学] R192[医药卫生—临床医学]