检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡学芹[1] 王畅 田园 韩淑苗 陈文[1] HU Xue-qin;WANG Chang;TIAN Yuan;HAN Shu-miao;CHEN Wen(The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University,Haikou,Hainan 570311,China)
机构地区:[1]海南医学院第二附属医院肾内科
出 处:《中华医院感染学杂志》2019年第14期2125-2129,共5页Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
基 金:海南省科学技术厅科研基金资助项目(807112)
摘 要:目的对比单发性与多发性腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎(PDRP)的临床特点、病原菌分布及预后,为透析患者继发感染的预防和治疗提供研究依据。方法选择2011年6月-2017年12月的120例PDRP患者,单发性PDRP患者80例,多发性PDRP患者40例。对两类患者的临床特点、病原菌分布及预后情况进行对比和分析。结果两类PDRP患者的年龄、血清血红蛋白水平、白蛋白水平、首次发病至透析开始时间、合并糖尿病、透析为他人操作等差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。单发性PDRP患者检出病原菌75株,其中,革兰阳性菌37株占49.33%,革兰阴性菌30株占40%,真菌8株占10.67%;多发性PDRP患者检出病原菌43株,其中,革兰阳性菌17株占39.53%,革兰阴性菌12株占27.91%,真菌14株占32.56%。两类患者病原菌构成比的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。单发性PDRP患者与多发性PDRP患者的预后转归情况的差异无统计学意义。结论多发性PDRP患者存在一定临床特征,病原菌以革兰阳性菌为主,积极治疗后不会导致患者出现明显的预后恶化。OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical characteristics of single and multiple peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis(PDRP) and analyze the distribution of pathogens and prognosis so as to provide guidance for prevention and treatment of secondary infection in the dialysis patients. METHODS A total of 120 PDRP patients who were treated in the hospital from Jun 2011 to Dec 2017 were enrolled in the study, including 80 cases of single PDRP and 40 cases of multiple PDRP. The clinical characteristics, distribution of pathogens and prognosis were observed and compared between the two types of patients. RESULTS There were significant differences in the age, serum hemoglobin level, albumin level, interval between first onset of peritonitis and start of dialysis, complication of diabetes mellitus, and dialysis performed by others between the two types of PDRP patients(P<0.05). Totally 75 strains of pathogens were isolated from the patients with single PDRP, 37(49.33%) of which were gram-positive bacteria, 30(40%) were gram-negative bacteria, and 8(10.67%) were fungi. Totally 43 strains of pathogens were isolated from the patients with multiple PDRP, 17(39.53%) of which were gram-positive bacteria, 12(27.91%) were gram-negative bacteria, and 14(32.56%) were fungi. There were significant differences in the constituent ratios of pathogens between the two types of patients(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the prognosis between the patients with single PDRP and the patients with multiple PDRP. CONCLUSION The patients with multiple PDRP show certain clinical characteristics, the gram-positive bacteria are dominant among the pathogens, and active treatment may not lead to the significant deterioration of prognosis.
关 键 词:腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎 临床特点 病原菌分布 预后
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15