“非西方”的可能性:丸山真男的日本政治思想史研究方法及启示  

Possibility of “Non-Western”: On Maruyama Masao’s Methodology of History of Japanese Political Thoughts

作　　者：邱静[1] Qiu jing

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学国际关系学院

出　　处：《日本学刊》2019年第4期138-162,共25页Japanese Studies

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“日本改宪动向及其对中日关系影响研究”(编号:18BGJ034)

摘　　要：日本政治思想史是一个很值得研究的对象。鉴于日本政治思想史自身的特点,对其的研究无法直接照搬西方或中国思想史的方法,日本学界的相关研究同样不能不加区别地采用。日本著名学者丸山真男并非西方中心意义上的“近代主义者”。通过对日本思考模式的讨论,丸山触及了对整体(包括西方)思想史研究方法的反思,并提出了可能拓展的方向。战后日本学界对丸山研究方法的争论本身就体现出日本某种根本性的思维方式仍未改变。对此现象的认识与反思不仅是日本思想界的重要课题,作为极具典型性的思想问题,也值得亚洲国家乃至所有国家共同加以关注。“非西方”世界相对于西方世界的复杂性不仅提出了思想史研究的众多新课题,也为思想史的方法论发展提供了契机。The History of Japanese political thoughts is unique and worth studying,which explains why one could not use directly the methodology of history of western political thoughts or that of Chinese political thoughts,or even the methodology suggested by the Japanese scholars to study it.Maruyama Masao's methodology of history of Japanese political thoughts should not be considered just as"modernism"without examining the connotation and background of the concept"modernism”.Based on his discussion on the pattern of Japanese way of thinking,Maruyama tried to reexamine the methodology of history of political thoughts originated in the western countries,and to offer new perspectives of research.The controversy on Maruyama's methodology in post-WWII Japan itself shows the constancy of the basic pattern of Japanese way of thinking.The reexamination of this phenomenon should be an important topic for not only Japan but also Asian countries and even the countries all over the world."Non-Westernn is complicated and should be considered as a new possibility instead of just the opposition to the"Western",which can contribute not only new topics but also new perspectives,methodology or paradigm for political thoughts studies.

关 键 词：日本政治思想史 研究方法 丸山真男 

分 类 号：B313.5[哲学宗教—外国哲学]